http://lmmresearch.org/blog/2007/09/21/amazonca-lucy-maud-montgomerys-favourite-places-books-deirdre-kesslermartin-caird/ Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:10:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= http://lmmresearch.org/blog/2007/09/21/amazonca-lucy-maud-montgomerys-favourite-places-books-deirdre-kesslermartin-caird/comment-page-1/#comment-989 Deirdre Kessler Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:07:32 +0000 http://lmmresearch.org/blog/2007/09/21/amazonca-lucy-maud-montgomerys-favourite-places-books-deirdre-kesslermartin-caird/#comment-989 How strange! The publisher of that book has been slow, slow, slow to get measly net-based royalties to me, although I see the book for sale almost everywhere other LMM-related works are. Obviously, authors get absolutely no royalties on such high-priced resales. Think I'll list the three copies I have to see if I can pay for a tank of gas. --dk How strange! The publisher of that book has been slow, slow, slow to get measly net-based royalties to me, although I see the book for sale almost everywhere other LMM-related works are. Obviously, authors get absolutely no royalties on such high-priced resales. Think I’ll list the three copies I have to see if I can pay for a tank of gas.
–dk

]]> http://lmmresearch.org/blog/2007/09/21/amazonca-lucy-maud-montgomerys-favourite-places-books-deirdre-kesslermartin-caird/comment-page-1/#comment-645 Benjamin Lefebvre Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:42:08 +0000 http://lmmresearch.org/blog/2007/09/21/amazonca-lucy-maud-montgomerys-favourite-places-books-deirdre-kesslermartin-caird/#comment-645 Hmmm. Who knew that distributing to the U.S. could be so costly?? Hmmm. Who knew that distributing to the U.S. could be so costly??

]]> http://lmmresearch.org/blog/2007/09/21/amazonca-lucy-maud-montgomerys-favourite-places-books-deirdre-kesslermartin-caird/comment-page-1/#comment-643 Beth Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:35:39 +0000 http://lmmresearch.org/blog/2007/09/21/amazonca-lucy-maud-montgomerys-favourite-places-books-deirdre-kesslermartin-caird/#comment-643 Surely this is a misprint! They must have meant $1890.70! Surely this is a misprint! They must have meant $1890.70!

]]>